In collaboration with Iranian Association for Energy Economics(IRAEE) and Scientific Association of Defence Economics of Iran(SADEI)

Document Type : applicative

Authors

1 ,Master of Energy Economics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

2 Associate Professor in Department of Economics, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

3 Professor of Economics in Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran

Abstract

In a participatory economic model for regional air pollution, an important point is how to rationally and fairly allocate costs and benefits to participants. Based on this principle, much and extensive research has been conducted on topics such as the distribution of benefits by using cooperative game theory. In this study, the effect of air pollution limitation on Iran’s employment of manufacturing firms has been investigated. Based on the minimum costs-remaining savings (MCRS) method, the total benefits of manufacturing Firms and the level of employment of them with 10 labor and more in the interactive econometrics model are more than the case of reducing pollution alone. Vice versa, the cost of reducing carbon dioxide emission in the interactive econometric model is lower than in the case of pollution reduction alone. The results show that the presented interactive econometrics model is superior to the current separate control model in terms of increasing employment and economies of expense for the same level of pollution control. Therefore, the current results can provide an important reference to support the regional decision-making, in addition to promoting cooperation and achieving win-win outcome for the participants.

Keywords

Cao, D., Song, C. Y., Wang, J. N., Jiang, H., Li, W. X., & Cao, G. Z. (2009). Establishment and empirical analysis of cost function for pollution combination abatement. Research of Environmental Sciences22(3), 371-376
Chang, K., Zhang, C., & Chang, H. (2016). Emissions reduction allocation and economic welfare estimation through interregional emissions trading in China: evidence from efficiency and equity. Energy113, 1125-1135
Dissou, Y., & Sun, Q. (2013). GHG mitigation policies and employment: A CGE analysis with wage rigidity and application to Canada. Canadian Public Policy39(Supplement 2), S53-S65‏
Ferris, A. E., Shadbegian, R. J., & Wolverton, A. (2014). The effect of environmental regulation on power sector employment: Phase I of the title IV SO2 trading program. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists1(4), 521-553‏
Gray, W. B., & Shadbegian, R. J. (2014). Do the job effects of regulation differ with the competitive environment. Does regulation kill jobs
Guo, D., Bose, S., & Alnes, K. (2017). Employment implications of stricter pollution regulation in China: theories and lessons from the USA. Environment, Development and Sustainability19(2), 549-569
Joltreau, E., & Sommerfeld, K. (2016). Why does emissions trading under the EU ETS not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature. Empirical Findings from the Literature (September 2016). ZEW-Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper, (16-062).‏
Kahn, M. E., & Mansur, E. T. (2013). Do local energy prices and regulation affect the geographic concentration of employment?. Journal of Public Economics101, 105-114
Liu, F., Xu, K., & Zheng, M. (2018). The effect of environmental regulation on employment in China: empirical research based on individual-level data. Sustainability10(7), 2373.
Liu, H., & Lin, B. (2017). Cost-based modelling of optimal emission quota allocation. Journal of Cleaner Production149, 472-484
Liu, M., Shadbegian, R., & Zhang, B. (2017). Does environmental regulation affect labor demand in China? Evidence from the textile printing and dyeing industry. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management86, 277-294
Liu, M., Zhang, B., & Geng, Q. (2018). Corporate pollution control strategies and labor demand: evidence from China’s manufacturing sector. Journal of Regulatory Economics53(3), 298-326
Pisoni, E., & Volta, M. (2009). Modeling Pareto efficient PM10 control policies in Northern Italy to reduce health effects. Atmospheric Environment43(20), 3243-3248‏50.
Sheng, J., Zhou, W., & Zhang, S. (2019). The role of the intensity of environmental regulation and corruption in the employment of manufacturing enterprises: evidence from
Walker, W. R. (2011). Environmental regulation and labor reallocation: Evidence from the Clean Air Act. American Economic Review101(3), 442-47
Wang, Q., Zhao, L., Guo, L., Jiang, R., Zeng, L., Xie, Y., & Bo, X. (2019). A generalized Nash equilibrium game model for removing regional air pollutant. Journal of Cleaner Production227, 522-531‏
Wu, M. W., & Shen, C. H. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in the banking industry: Motives and financial performance. Journal of Banking & Finance37(9), 3529-3547‏
Xie, Y., Zhao, L., Xue, J., Hu, Q., Xu, X., & Wang, H. (2016). A cooperative reduction model for regional air pollution control in China that considers adverse health effects and pollutant reduction costs. Science of the Total Environment573, 458-469