In collaboration with Iranian Association for Energy Economics(IRAEE) and Scientific Association of Defence Economics of Iran(SADEI)

Document Type : applicative

Authors

1 Ph.D of Economics, Strategic Management Faculty, Supreme National Defence University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor in Economics, Economics & Political Sciences Faculty, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Ph.D. of Economics, Department of Economics, Faculty of Management and Economics, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

10.30473/jier.2024.71492.1456

Abstract

The realization of foreign direct investment in the form of joint venture contracts, with many benefits for the host country, requires the necessary alignment between two economies (the country of origin and host) with different characteristics. According to the theoretical literature, it is expected that the sanction of the host country as a factor of increasing risk and uncertainty has a positive effect on attracting foreign investment in the form of joint ventures, but its effect can be decreased by factors such as the weakness of the legal infrastructure and transparent legal procedures of the host country. In the present study, an appropriate framework is investigated for attracting foreign direct investment based on partnership with local investors under the conditions of Iran’s industry sanction. This study was done using the Bayesian vector autoregression  (BVAR) model. Based on the results of this study, a substantial difference in the investment behavior of the developed countries' subsidiary companies and the subsidiaries companies and individuals of the developing countries in the region is evident. According to the results, the sanction of the host country causes a decrease in the desire to enter the industry sector in the form of joint investment, but its effect depends on the effect of other variables such as market size, governance efficiency and commercial openness on the attracting foreign direct investment in the form of Joint venture is less.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Brewer, Thomas L., and Stephen Young. )1998(. The Multilateral Investment System and Multinational Enterprises. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brouthers,K.D.(2002)."Institutional, Cultural, and Transaction Costs Influences on Entry Mode Choice and Performance." Journal of International Business Studies 33(2): 203-221.
Byun,H-S;Lee,H-H;Park, C-Y (2012),Assessing Factors Affecting M&As versus Greenfield FDI in Emerging Countries, ADB Economics Working Paper Series, 293, Asian Development Bank (ADB), Manila.
Davies.RB, Desbordes.R ,Greenfield FDI and skill upgrading: A polarized issue, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne, d'économique 48 (1), 207-244.
Dong-Hun, Kim.(2011)”Coercive Assets? Foreign Direct Investments and the Use of Economic Sanctions”EAI Asia Security Initiative, Working Paper13.
 
Horstmann, Ignatius, and James R. Markusen. (1989). "Firm-Specific Assets and the Gains from Direct Foreign Investment." Economica 65(41-48).
Reuer, Jeffrey J. (2004). Strategic Alliances: Theory and Evidence. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mirkina, I.,(2018) “FDI and sanctions: An empirical analysis of short- and long-run effects“,European Journal of Political Economy, 32(1), 5–28. dol:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2018.05.008.
Moran, Theodore H., Edward Graham, and Magnus Blomstrom.(2005). Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development? Washington, D.C.: Institute of International Economics.
Nanu,VasileCostinTheodor(2010),International joint venture, Submitted to KDI School of Public Policy and Management in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of business administration.
Tadashi ITO ,Ayumu TANAKA,(2020) FDI, Ownership Structure, and Productivity, RIETI Discussion Paper Series 20-E-017. Gakushuin University, Tokyo, Japa